Before retirement, The revolving door between government lawyers and big-name private law firms was considered. I noted that a number of regulators to work at the state and federal level were constantly being hired away and go to work for private law firms.
At this point, they often work for corporations to deal with the regulations of regulatory government offices. One might ask why corporations and all companies had to hire armies of government lawyers to fight for all the crazy rules. Their lawyers coming from the government in the never-ending revolving door made at least five times the money in private practice.
 |
Business Safety Is Suitable For Government Lawyers.
Now then, because I know that the regime is heavy-handed with the regulatory rules on businesses, often to the point that they are not helping the users, the public, or anyone else, rather it is only of their existence justified by the increase in the number of investigations, fines and lawsuits, not the fault of the business, safety is suitable for government lawyers. This fact and anyone who tells you otherwise is a bleeding heart that is never a business for themselves because they probably do not know what they are talking about. I do.
It Is Strange That Government Lawyers Claim.
Still, I don't like the revolving door more and more, because it seems as if it is unethical. It is strange that government lawyers claim to be the epitome of morality and yet engage in this weird gray area.
It gets worse when the government lawyers or attorneys by the highest court in the country of the Supreme Court judges themselves, but all their underlings are constantly in and out of government, and busy making friends, no not on Facebook, friends with big deep pockets, who had a love for them will serve, often through crony capitalism.
The Wall Street Journal had an interesting article the other day entitled; "The High Court Clerk attract hiring frenzy," published on September 17, 2012, which stated; "the signing of former Supreme Court law clerk gives law firms reputation, as well as an enticing marketing tool. “Well, I must say so;” It certainly does! "However, what to spend, where was I?
OK, so, a big law firm hires the Supreme Court clerk, he is a high advantage because you can call anyone on the phone that they know who also works there, and their paperwork at the top of the stack, and that my friends are stacking the deck and it is unfair. It is unfair to everyone, especially to all citizens, taxpayers, and those who believe that the Constitution of the United States is the supreme law of the land.
It no longer reigns supreme when it's been manipulated this way, even if it's just going to be procedural. Indeed, I hope you will please consider all this, and all results of this kind of revolving door between the behavior of government lawyers, clerks, the Supreme Court, and law firms.